Tested against live federal filings — District of Nevada

Know the Ruling
Before It's Issued

Upload your motion. A judicial panel shows you exactly how it fails — before opposing counsel does.

File blind. Or know exactly where you lose.

Launching
May 15, 2026
calculating... remaining
Motion · Court · Theory
FHA § 3617 — Interference/Retaliation
Federal District · D. Nev. · Panel of Five · Ingested 100%
Hon. R. Hargrove · Textualist
GRANTED
Hon. M. Delacroix · Equitable
GRANTED
Hon. S. Whitfield · Proceduralist
PARTIAL
Hon. D. Calloway · Skeptical
DENIED
Hon. C. Brennan · Appellate
GRANTED
PROCEED WITH PATCHES
3–1–1 split · Panel Reliability A · 2 patches required before filing
Test Your Motion → See Where It Breaks
PinkViper Labs Suite
Used in active litigation · multiple federal cases · D. Nev.
What's actually at stake

This doesn't replace you.
It stops you from getting destroyed.

Every unfiled motion has a Kill Shot in it somewhere. An argument opposing counsel will make that you didn't see coming. A citation the model hallucinated that you almost filed. A procedural defect that independently defeats the motion before the merits are even reached.

PreRuling finds it first. Not after the ruling. Not after sanctions. Before opposing counsel uses it against you.

Already filed? Run it anyway. You'll see exactly what opposing counsel is about to argue.

Rule 11 Exposure
AI tools hallucinate citations. A hallucinated statute in a federal filing can result in sanctions under Rule 11 or the court's inherent authority. PreRuling flags every citation before it reaches your filing.
The Kill Shot You Didn't See
Every motion has one argument that defeats it independently — before anything else is weighed. PreRuling identifies it and shows you exactly how opposing counsel will use it. Counter it before they do.
The Minimum Change That Wins
Most motions don't fail because they're wrong. They fail because of one missing element, one unpled fact, one procedural gap. PreRuling shows you the smallest fix — not a rewrite. A minimum change.
✗ What a losing motion looks like
DENIED — failure to plead element 3 (causation). No specific date, no factual basis for knowledge allegation.
Independent procedural defect under FRCP 65(a) — motion fails on this issue alone regardless of merits.
UNVERIFIED citation: Williams v. Meridian Corp., 892 F.3d 1144 — confirm before filing.
PreRuling catches all three before this motion reaches the clerk.
Intake Form

The Panel Knows Your Case

Party names are locked. Theories are selected. Jurisdiction is set. The panel cannot drift, flip parties, or apply the wrong standard.

🔒

Party Lock

Name your plaintiff and defendant. Every judge prompt is hardcoded: these roles are fixed and cannot be reassigned. Allegations are never treated as established facts.

Plaintiff lockDefendant lockRole selectionNo party flip
⚖️

Legal Theory Selection

Select all theories that apply. Each evaluated independently. Panel flags theory drift if a judge strays outside your selected theories.

FHA § 3617FDCPAFCRAECOA42 U.S.C. § 1983Slander of TitleAbuse of ProcessRule 11+ 7 more
🏛️

Jurisdiction + Assigned Judge

Select your district. Optionally select your assigned judge — D. Nev. profiles cover five documented judicial philosophies across the district. The entire panel calibrates to their ruling patterns.

D. Nev.C.D. Cal.S.D. Tex.5 D. Nev. profilesSelect in-app
📄

Document Type + Section Tagging

Tag what you're submitting. Initial Complaint triggers Twombly/Iqbal. MTD triggers 12(b)(6) attack. Opposition Brief checks whether it successfully rebuts.

Initial ComplaintMotion to DismissOpposition BriefReply BriefCause of Action OnlyFull Document
Three-Column Document Layout
Plaintiff · Moving Party
Complaints / Pleadings
✓ 94 pages · 94% ingested
Motions Filed
Declarations / Affidavits
Exhibits / Evidence
The Motion · Required
The Motion ★
✓ sanctions_motion.pdf
Opposition / Response
Reply Brief
Upload or paste · PDF, DOCX, TXT
Paste = 100% ingestion · live token counter
Defendant · Opposing Party
Answers / Pleadings
Motions Filed
Declarations / Affidavits
Exhibits / Evidence
Theory-Calibrated Panels

Different Case, Different Panel

Your theory selection determines which judges hear your motion. Civil rights gets civil rights specialists. Consumer law gets consumer law specialists.

Civil Rights Panel
FHA · § 1983 · Retaliation
§
Hon. T. Morrison
Civil Rights Textualist
Hon. R. Okafor
Civil Rights Equitable
Hon. B. Garfield
Civil Rights Skeptic
Hon. C. Brennan
Appellate Judge
Hon. S. Whitfield
Proceduralist
Consumer Law Panel
FDCPA · FCRA · ECOA
§
Hon. P. Nakamura
Consumer Law Textualist
Hon. M. Delacroix
Equitable / Balancing
Hon. D. Calloway
Skeptical Trial Judge
Hon. C. Brennan
Appellate Judge
Hon. S. Whitfield
Proceduralist
Hearing Modes

Choose Your Stress Test

Three levels of scrutiny. The more judges, the more pressure — and the more intelligence you walk away with.

Panel of Three
Full Panel Analysis
Three theory-calibrated judges rule independently. Fatal Flaws, confidence scoring, Opposition Intel™, Patches, Survival Paths, and Outcome Shift™. ~60–90 seconds.
  • Theory-calibrated judge selection
  • Fatal Flaws — hard motion killers first
  • Opposition Intel™ per judicial philosophy
  • Patches + minimum viable changes
  • Outcome Shift™ — rerun after patches
  • Flip This Ruling — minimum to flip each DENIED
Panel of Five
Maximum Stress Test
Adds the Skeptical Trial Judge and Appellate Judge. The hardest possible review. If it survives this panel, it will survive court. ~2–3 minutes.
  • All Panel of 3 outputs
  • Skeptical Judge — defaults to denial
  • Appellate Judge — would this survive appeal?
  • Panel Reliability Score A–F
  • Model collapse detection
  • Recommended before any significant filing
Single Judge
Coming Soon
Live Bench Hearing
An interactive argument session with a single judge. The court calls the matter, asks bench questions, pushes back hard. You respond in real time. Written ruling issued after argument.
  • Realistic bench Q&A — judge stays in character
  • Written ruling with findings of fact
  • Conclusions of law + GRANTED or DENIED
  • Best for oral argument preparation
In development · Premium tier feature
The Judicial Panel

Five Archetypes. Theory-Assigned.

Each judge has a distinct philosophy. Your theory selection determines who hears your motion.

§
Hon. R. Hargrove
Textualist
Plain language controls. No equitable gap-filling. Every element must be pled by its text. Civil rights variant: Hon. T. Morrison.
Hon. M. Delacroix
Equitable / Balancing
Weighs hardship, good faith, and practical outcomes. Pattern of conduct over isolated acts. Civil rights variant: Hon. R. Okafor.
Hon. S. Whitfield
Proceduralist
Strict rules compliance. Deadlines. Evidentiary foundations. Iqbal element-by-element. Miss one requirement — the motion is dead.
Hon. D. Calloway
Skeptical Trial Judge
Defaults to denial. Hammers irreparable harm and urgency relentlessly. Panel of 5 only. Civil rights variant: Hon. B. Garfield.
Hon. C. Brennan
Appellate Judge
Would this order survive de novo review? Demands clean legal standards and airtight citations. Panel of 5 only.
Used on real filings in D. Nev. — not a demo, not simulated inputs.
If it fails here, it fails in court.
What You Get

Intelligence, Not Just a Verdict

Every simulation delivers a complete litigation intelligence package. Here's exactly what's in it — sourced from the live codebase.

Intake & Setup
🔒

Party Lock

Plaintiff and defendant names hardcoded into every judge prompt. Roles cannot flip. Allegations are never treated as established facts.

⚖️

12 Motion Types

Each carries its own legal standard: Preliminary Injunction (Winter four-factor), MTD (Twombly/Iqbal), Summary Judgment, Sanctions, Default Judgment, TRO, Motion to Compel, Attorney Fees, Stay, Reconsideration, Strike, and Other.

🏛️

6 Court Types + Circuit Overlay

Federal District, Federal Appellate, State General, State Appellate, State Limited, and Bankruptcy Court. Circuit precedent overlays applied automatically. Bankruptcy triggers automatic stay analysis.

📄

15 Legal Theories

FHA § 3617, FHA § 3604, FDCPA, FCRA, ECOA, § 1983, Breach of Contract, Fraud, Negligence, Abuse of Process, Slander of Title, Tortious Interference, DTPA, Rule 11, and Other. Theory routes your motion to a calibrated judge panel.

📋

Document Type Tagging

Tag what you're submitting: Initial Complaint, MTD, Opposition Brief, Reply Brief, Cause of Action Only, or Full Document. Each triggers a different analytical standard in every judge prompt.

📄

Paste Mode — 100% Ingestion

Paste directly for clean, complete ingestion. Bypasses PDF OCR entirely. Live token counter and budget percentage per slot. Chunked mode auto-triggers for large complaints at 95K characters.

Panel Analysis
⚠️

Fatal Flaws Detection

Issues that independently kill the motion. Hard Fatal (do not file), Soft Fatal (fix first), Tactical (strengthen). Each includes a Minimum Change to Win.

🎯

The Kill Shot

The single most lethal argument against this motion — surfaced from the most skeptical judge and displayed first. If you can't answer it, you're not ready to file.

Where This Motion Actually Dies

Each judge identifies the argument most likely to defeat this motion. All five displayed together — shows where the panel converges on your weakest point.

⚔️

Judicial Conflict — Use the Split Against Them

When the panel splits, PreRuling extracts the exact reasoning on both sides. Why it grants. Why it denies. Use the grant logic as your primary argument. The deny logic is opposing counsel's attack — you see it coming.

📊

Which Theory Survives — and Which Collapses

Each judge evaluates your Primary Theory, an Alternative Theory if primary fails, and an independent Equitable Basis. The motion succeeds if any single theory independently meets the standard.

🧠

Theory Drift Detection

If a judge analyzes outside your selected legal theory, a warning banner fires on their ruling card. You selected the theory — the panel stays in it.

Intelligence Output
🕵️

Opposition Intel™

What opposing counsel will argue per judge philosophy — DEVASTATING, STRONG, or MODERATE lethality. Counter-reframe per argument. Killer Bench Question per judge.

🔎

Defense Exploit Detector

Inside Opposition Intel™ — identifies specific defense framings in your own filing, exposure level, and the exact counter each requires. Shows how they'll use your own language against you.

Strict vs Strategic — Survive & Win Modes

Two analyses per judge, never blended. Strict shows the likely outcome. Strategic shows the Key Reframe. Toggle between Survive (can this hold?) and Win (what does it take to win outright?).

🏆

Win Path — Probability Attached

Inside Win mode — each judge outputs a specific strategy, required changes, and an estimated outcome shift percentage. A specific path to GRANTED with probability attached.

🔧

Patches + Minimum Change to Win

Every weakness ranked by severity and confidence. Each patch includes the smallest single edit that neutralizes the issue. LOW confidence patches flagged with a warning.

👲

Survival Paths

Alternative legal theories that survive even when strict analysis says deny. Viability ratings (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW) and exactly which weakness each path overcomes.

Control & Reliability
🔄

Flip This Ruling

For each judge: Primary Obstacle, Flip Theory, numbered Minimum Changes Required, whether new evidence is needed, and confidence if flipped.

🔄

Outcome Shift™

Run Outcome Shift™ — Apply All Patches. Reruns the full panel with patches implemented. Shows which judges flipped and how confidence changed.

📊

Panel Reliability Score A–F

Live in the sticky header. Factors in judge success rate, model collapse detection, volatility, and average confidence. A means file it. F means fix your inputs first.

🔍

Citation Extraction

Every citation flagged UNVERIFIED. Verify against Westlaw, Lexis, or CourtListener before filing. Protects against Rule 11 exposure on hallucinated citations.

🧠

Model Collapse Detection

Detects if judges produce identical reasoning or confidence scores. Flags it in the header and penalizes the Panel Reliability Score automatically.

📝

Full Report Export

Download a complete HTML report — all rulings, fatal flaws, patches, opposition intel, and survival paths. Attorney-ready and shareable.

The Strategic Read

PreRuling doesn't help you write better.
It shows you exactly how you lose.

That's a different category. Upload your motion. See the Kill Shot. See the citation that would have gotten you sanctioned. See the minimum change that flips the ruling. Then decide whether to file.

A–F
Panel Reliability
30+
Federal Districts
15
Legal Theories
5
Judge Archetypes
0
Hallucinated Statutes Filed
Citation Extraction

The Tool That Prevents Sanctions

Every citation in the panel output is flagged before you file. A hallucinated statute in a federal filing can result in Rule 11 sanctions. PreRuling surfaces every citation so you can verify it — and tells you exactly where to check.

15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b) — reinvestigation duty
✓ VERIFIED
Safeco Ins. Co. v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47 (2007)
UNVERIFIED
NRS § 107.080(4) — foreclosure cure period
✓ VERIFIED
Williams v. Meridian Credit Corp., 892 F.3d 1144
⚠ SUSPECT
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) — meet and confer
✓ VERIFIED
⚠ SUSPECT citations match the pattern of statutory references but do not appear in the verified database. Treat as potentially hallucinated. Verify against Westlaw, Lexis, or CourtListener before including in any court filing. A SUSPECT statutory citation in a federal filing can result in Rule 11 sanctions.

Verified

Matches the PreRuling verified statutes database. Covers FHA, FDCPA, FCRA, ECOA, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, all Fed. R. Civ. P. rules, and major NRS sections.

?

Unverified

Not in the verified database but doesn't match known hallucination patterns. Default for case citations. Verify before using.

Suspect — Do Not File

Looks like a statute but doesn't match any confirmed entry. Treat as potentially hallucinated. Do not include in any court filing without independent verification.

Sample Output

What a Real Panel Result Looks Like

Full panel simulation on a federal sanctions motion. Identifying details removed.

✓ GRANTED · 5–0 · AVG 95% · LOW VOLATILITY · INGESTED 100% · PANEL 90% · A · Panel is aligned. Filing is recommended.
MAJORITY: GRANTED · 5–0
AVG JUDICIAL CONFIDENCE 95%
A
PROCEED
Fatal Flaws (0)
Rulings
Patches (5)
Opposition Intel™
Strict vs Strategic
Survival Paths
Flip This Ruling
color:var(--text3);margin-bottom:10px">✓ No Hard#10003; No Hard Fatal Flaws — Motion Is Viable
Discovery Misconduct Is Documented and Systematic
Hon. P. Nakamura · Consumer Textualist — Audit log withholding pattern across three facilities satisfies the objective standard under FRCP 37. Record is clear and relief is proportionate.
Prejudice to Moving Party Established
Hon. M. Delacroix · Equitable — Without withheld records, moving party cannot establish full scope of underlying claim. Equitable balance favors sanctions.
⚠ Soft Fatal — Fix Before Filing
Strengthen Meet-and-Confer Documentation
Hon. S. Whitfield · Proceduralist — The meet-and-confer declaration is thin. Add a detailed declaration under FRCP 37(a)(1). Minimum change: one paragraph with date, method, and substance of conferral.
Opposition Intel™ — What Opposing Counsel Will Argue
"Movant has not established willful bad faith as required for sanctions under FRCP 37. The withheld records were subject to a pending vendor data retention dispute outside counsel's control. Delay in production does not satisfy the bad faith standard absent evidence of intentional concealment."
MODERATE · panel found bad faith despite this argument · counter-reframe available
How It Works

Upload. See How You Lose. Fix It.

What takes weeks of briefing and oral argument happens here in minutes.

01

Complete the Intake Form

Define the case before the panel sees a single word. Name the parties, select your legal theories, choose your court, and optionally select your assigned judge. This context is locked into every judge prompt — no drift, no party flipping, no wrong standard.

Party lockTheory selectionJurisdiction calibrationAssigned judge profiles
02

Upload or Paste Your Documents

Upload PDFs to the three-column layout (Plaintiff / Motion / Defendant) or paste directly for 100% ingestion. Large complaints are automatically chunked at logical section breaks. Live token counter shows exactly how much is being analyzed.

PDF extractionPaste = 100% ingestionChunked modeLive token counter
03

The Panel Deliberates

An interpretation layer runs first — analyzing timeline, irreparable harm, status quo, and contradictions. Each theory-calibrated judge rules independently. Results stream in progressively. Panel Reliability Score A–F and model collapse detection run automatically.

Interpretation layerProgressive renderingTheory-calibratedCollapse detection
04

Apply the Intelligence and File

Review Fatal Flaws, apply patches, run Outcome Shift™, check Flip This Ruling for DENIED judges. Export the full report. File with confidence — or don't file at all. That's the point.

Outcome Shift™Flip This RulingFull report export
Jurisdiction Coverage

Calibrated to Your Court

Jurisdiction-specific case law overlays for 30+ federal districts and major state courts. Select your district and the panel applies dominant precedents and procedural quirks for that court.

D. Nev.
9th Circuit
5 assigned judge profiles
C.D. Cal.
9th Circuit
9th Circuit overlay
S.D. Tex.
5th Circuit
5th Circuit overlay
S.D.N.Y.
2nd Circuit
2nd Circuit overlay
S.D. Fla.
11th Circuit
11th Circuit overlay
N.D. Ill.
7th Circuit
7th Circuit overlay
E.D. Va.
4th Circuit
4th Circuit overlay
Nevada State
Nevada Supreme Court
NRS overlay
+ 22 additional federal districts and 4 state courts. Full list in the app.
Pricing

Not SaaS Pricing. Litigation Pricing.

One bad motion. One sanctionable citation. One kill shot you didn't see. PreRuling costs less than the mistake it prevents. Access is included — no API key required.

Solo
$149/mo
Per month · cancel anytime
  • 10 panel simulations/month
  • Panel of 3 + Panel of 5
  • Full intake form + party lock
  • Fatal Flaws + Patches
  • Citation extraction
  • Full report export
  • Email support
Test Your Motion
Attorney MOST POPULAR
$499/mo
Per month · cancel anytime
  • 30 panel simulations/month
  • All modes incl. Panel of 5
  • Theory-calibrated panels
  • Opposition Intel™ full output
  • Outcome Shift™ + Flip This Ruling
  • Strict vs Strategic + Win Path
  • Defense Exploit Detector
  • Judicial Conflict analysis
  • Full report export
  • Priority support
Get Early Access →
Firm
$1,999/mo
Up to 5 seats
$3,999/mo for up to 10 seats
  • 100 panel simulations/month
  • Everything in Attorney
  • Centralized billing + seat mgmt
  • API access
  • LitigatorOS integration
  • Usage analytics dashboard
  • Debug mode + raw log access
  • Dedicated support
Contact Us
Enterprise
Custom
Unlimited seats · custom SLA
  • Unlimited simulations
  • Everything in Firm
  • Unlimited attorney seats
  • Custom feature requests
  • Custom judge profiles
  • Dedicated infrastructure
  • White-label option
  • Direct integration support
  • Quarterly roadmap input
  • Named account manager
Talk to Us →
Early access pricing locks at launch · May 15, 2026 · Access included with your plan · No API key required · BYOK option coming soon
⚖️

Built in Active Federal Litigation

PreRuling was stress-tested in active federal and state cases — not in a demo environment. It has been used to evaluate real filings in D. Nev. before they were submitted. The Solo plan is priced for pro se litigants. If cost is a barrier, reach out directly.